Skip to content

France

Wildfires

Six different regions across France

With respect to large wildfires, France has been divided into six environmental units (28):

  • The northern region. This is the less fire-prone region, corresponding to a temperate climate in which average summer temperatures are relatively low. This region covers more than half of France but contributes only 1.9% to national burned area during 2001 to 2016.
  • The Alpine region, dominated by conifer forests at high elevation and broadleaf forest at low elevation, and contributing 2.3% to national burned area during 2001 to 2016.
  • The western region, corresponding to the southern Atlantic climate characterized by warm and dry summers coupled with mild and humid winters, and contributing 5.4% to national burned area during 2001 to 2016.
  • The Mediterranean mountains, which combine the influence of both Mediterranean and mountain climates, and contribute 34.8% to national burned area during 2001 to 2016.
  • The Mediterranean north, containing holm oak and cork-oak-dominated vegetation and contributing 25.7% to national burned area during 2001 to 2016.
  • The Mediterranean south, a low-elevation area spanning the Rhône delta that contributes 7.1% to national burned area during 2001 to 2016.

The high percentage for the Mediterranean north illustrates that large wildfires occur when multiple conditions are gathered, namely high winds, dry fuel and low soil moisture levels. In flammability-limited systems such as the Alpine and southwestern regions, long-term drought is a significant predictor of large wildfires (28).

Vulnerabilities

In the summer 2003 heat wave in France, the costs of fighting forest fires for the Ministry of Interior increased from EUR 83 million in a normal year to EUR 179 million (1).

The Alps

So far, forest fires do not constitute a significant hazard in the central and northern parts of the Alps, while on the southern side they are more common even if the fire number and the burned area are low compared to the neighbouring Mediterranean area, where the climate is more in favour of the development of frequent and large wildfires (3).


Read more

Changing wildfire regimes in Mediterranean Europe

Human activities versus climate change 

Higher temperatures and more droughts not necessarily lead to an increase in the number of wildfires or the area burnt annually. Human activity may alter fire regimes to such an extent that climate change impacts are completely overruled. These human alterations may both increase and decrease fire probability (7). An increase may result from land-use changes or more outdoor activities (including tourism) (8). A decrease may result from more effective fire suppression. Changes in land-use and fire suppression policy seem to have exceeded the strength of climate change effects on changing fire regime in southern France during the period 1976-2009. The complex interaction of climate change and human effects, which may vary regionally and from one season to another, makes regional predictions of future fires highly challenging (7). A study on the Mediterranean region on fire trends in Portugal, Spain, southern France, Italy, and Greece in the period 1985-2011 revealed a general decreasing trend of the total annual burned area in all countries, with the exception of Portugal (30). Future projections show an overall increase in fire danger for France throughout the century, however, with the largest absolute increases in the Mediterranean area (31,32).


Read more

Adaptation strategies

In the national strategy of France the following adaptation measures are recommended (2):

  • improve forecasting in the zonal systems;
  • optimise the means of combating forest fires in terms of cost/efficiency.

Adaptation strategies: impact of new fire policy of 1994 

Establishing new tactics and strategies for a better prevention and preparedness to face large fires has become a centerpiece of the European fire policy (21). Large and destructive wildfires are likely to increase in southern Europe due to changes in climate and landscape (22). Yet little is known about the return periods of large fires. This also holds for southern France, where 2500 fires have been reported each year in the period 1994 to 2016. Together, they have burned approximately 12,000 ha annually, on average (23). Most of these fires are small. The largest fires (> 100 ha) represent only 1 % of the total number of fires. However, they account for approximately 70 % of the total burned area and they consume two-thirds of the total annual budget dedicated to civil protection against fire risk (24). From 2001 to 2016, across France, the average large-wildfire area (exceeding 100 ha) was found to be 398 ha, with the largest wildfire reaching 7675 ha (28).

The return period of these large fires, characterized by their burned area, has been quantified for southern France (20). This was done for two periods: 1973 - 1994 and 1995 - 2016. A new fire policy was set up in 1994 to reduce the likelihood of very large wildfires. This policy is based on improved prevention of fires, increased surveillance of forests, and a massive attack on all ignitions in order to prevent fire enlargement (23). Thus, by focusing on these two periods, the impact of this new fire policy can be assessed.


Read more

References

The references below are cited in full in a separate map 'References'. Please click here if you are looking for the full references for France.

  1. EEA, JRC and WHO (2008)
  2. ONERC (2007/2009)
  3. Cane et al. (2013)
  4. Wastl et al. (2012), in: Cane et al. (2013)
  5. Fréjaville and Curt (2015)
  6. Ruffault et al. (2017)
  7. Fréjaville and Curt (2017)
  8. Ganteaume and Jappiot (2013), in: Fréjaville and Curt (2017)
  9. Fréjaville et al. (2016), in: Fréjaville and Curt (2017)
  10. Batllori et al. (2013), in: Fréjaville and Curt (2017)
  11. Moreira et al. (2011), in: Fréjaville and Curt (2017)
  12. Moreira et al. (2011); Pausas and Fernández- Muñoz (2012), both in: Fréjaville and Curt (2017) 
  13. Pezzatti et al. (2013); Moreno et a.l (2014), both in: Fréjaville and Curt (2017)
  14. Higuera et al. (2015), in: Fréjaville and Curt (2017)
  15. Curt et al. (2016), in: Fréjaville and Curt (2017)
  16. Keeley (2004); Pausas (2004); Meyn et al. (2007); Zumbrunnen et al. (2009); O’Donnell et al. Pausas (2011), all in: Fréjaville and Curt (2017)
  17. McWethy et al. (2013), in: Fréjaville and Curt (2017)
  18. Ruffault et al. (2017), in: Fréjaville and Curt (2017)
  19. Turco et al. (2014), in: Fréjaville and Curt (2017)
  20. Evin et al. (2018)
  21. EFIMED (2011); Moreira et al. (2011); Fernandes et al. (2013); Tedim et al. (2016), all in: Evin et al. (2018)
  22. Bedia et al. (2014); Oliveira et al. (2014), both in: Evin et al. (2018)
  23. Curt and Frejaville (2018), in: Evin et al. (2018)
  24. Chatry et al. (2010); Curt and Frejaville (2018), both in: Evin et al. (2018)
  25. Costa et al. (2011), in: Evin et al. (2018)
  26. Lahaye et al. (2018), in: Evin et al. (2018)
  27. Ruffault et al. (2016a,b, 2018), in: Evin et al. (2018)
  28. Barbero et al. (2019)
  29. Ganteaume and Barbero (2019)
  30. Turco et al. (2016), in: Silva et al. (2019) 
  31. Fargeon et al. (2020)
  32. Lestienne et al. (2022)

Share this article: