Skip to content

Europe

Droughts

Droughts are the second most important natural disaster after floods. Between 1950 and 2014 droughts affected 2.2 billion people globally (10). Globally, drought account for 34% of disaster-related deaths between 1970 and 2019 (53). For Europe, the damage caused by droughts between 1950 and 2014 has been estimated to be EUR 621 Mio on average per event (10). To date, 11% of the European population and 17% of the area of the EU have been affected by water scarcity (11).


Read more

Four types of droughts

Four different types of drought have been defined (9):

  • Meteorological droughts relate to a deficiency of precipitation.
  • Hydrological droughts reduce streamflow and low water levels of reservoirs and lakes. Hydrological droughts mainly affect water resources management, power plant cooling, irrigation, and inland navigation. Groundwater droughts are a special case of hydrological droughts (van Lanen and Peters 2000, Kumar et al 2016). They occur when water deficiencies reach deep subsurface storages resulting in exceptionally low groundwater levels, groundwater recharge and baseflow. They reduce the supply of fresh water, where groundwater is the major source for drinking water supply.
  • Agricultural droughts are characterized by low soil water availability for plants, potentially leading to reduced biomass and yield or crop failure.
  • Socioeconomic droughts can emerge from all of the aforementioned drought types. It is characterized by a shortfall of water supply (water scarcity) leading to monetary losses  

Global trends over past decades

Man-made climate change has caused shifts in temperature and rainfall globally. It is to be expected that these shift have affected droughts on a global scale as well. Yet it is very complicated to detect human influence on global drought trends. This is due to the large natural variability compared with the climate change trends, and due to the fact that our records of drought observations are relatively short. The challenge to find a human influence on droughts in the last decades has been addressed on a global scale over the period 1900-2017 (33). Drought severity over this period (expressed as the Palmer drought severity index) has been reconstructed from tree ring data, and these data were compared with drought observations and climate model reconstructions. Two important conclusions can be drawn from these analyses.


Read more

European trends over past decades

Trends in soil and air dryness 1950-2022

More droughts since 1950: Droughts are more common in Europe and are often more extreme than in the middle of the last century. From 1950 to 2021, the amount of moisture in both the air and the soil appeared to have decreased significantly. Moreover, this trend is projected to continue towards 2100. This is the conclusion from a recent study on ‘a drying Europe’. Scientists analysed changes in both air dryness and soil moisture from 1950 to 2021. In addition, they added future projections towards 2100 based on simulations with many climate models (54). These simulations are based on a worst-case scenario of global warming (the so-called RCP8.5 scenario).


Read more

Vulnerabilities - Global assessment

Projected drought risk in 1.5°C and 2°C warmer climates

The goal of the Paris agreement is to hold global warming well below 2°C and to pursue efforts to limit to 1.5°C above preindustrial temperature. Global changes in drought risk under the 1.5°C and 2°C warming targets have been assessed from simulations based on a model designed specifically to test the climate impacts associated with 1.5°C and 2°C warming scenarios (14). The study focused on key drought-prone regions in North and South America, Europe, Africa, Asia, and Australia. In this study, the future period of 1.5°C and 2°C warming refers to the second half of this century. Changes were compared with the present-day reference period 1967-2016:


Read more

Vulnerabilities - Assessment Europe

Projected trends 1950-2100

Climate model simulations indicate that, under a worst-case scenario of climate change (the so-called RCP8.5 scenario), the frequency of compound dry extremes – the co-occurrence of extreme soil dryness and extreme air dryness – across Europe could be more than three times as high during mid-century (2031–2065) compared with 1950 – 1990, and more than four times as high by the end of this century (2066–2100). According to these simulations, the intensity of extreme soil dryness will not increase much further compared with the current situation. The intensity of air dryness, however, could increase across Europe on average by 33% and 65% by mid-century and the end of this century, respectively, compared to 1950–1990 (54).


Read more

Adaptation

Drought risk management should be based on 3 key pillars (13):

  • Monitoring, early warning and information delivery. Nations need to establish an integrated drought monitoring and early warning system that compiles information on the status of all segments of the hydrologic cycle: precipitation deficiencies, temperature anomalies, ground and surface water supplies, soil moisture, snowpack, vegetation status, long-term climate forecasts. This information must be delivered to decision makers at all levels in a timely fashion so risks can be mitigated and reduced.
  • Assessment of risk, vulnerability and impacts. Vulnerability refers to the degree of resilience to drought in a society or its ability to withstand the effects of a drought episode. Focus must be on different sectors, population groups and regions.
  • Mitigation and response. Mitigation refers to proactive measures that are identified and implemented that increase the resilience of an individual, population group, community or nation and, thus, reduce or eliminate the negative impacts of drought. 

Read more

References

The references below are cited in full in a separate map 'References'. Please click here if you are looking for the full references for Europe.

  1. Norwegian Meteorological Institute (2013)
  2. Kiktev et al. (2003); Alexander et al. (2006); Van der Schrier et al. (2006); Sheffield and Wood (2008); Dai (2011a), all in: Norwegian Meteorological Institute (2013)
  3. IPCC (2012), in: Norwegian Meteorological Institute (2013)
  4. IPCC (2014)
  5. Cook et al. (2014)
  6. Wanders and Wada (2015)
  7. Güneralp et al. (2015)
  8. Roudier et al. (2016)
  9. WMO (2006); Mishra and Singh (2010), both in: Zink et al. (2016)
  10. Guha-Sapir et al 2015, in: Zink et al. (2016)
  11. European Commission (2007, 2010), in: Zink et al. (2016)
  12. Smirnov et al. (2016)
  13. Wilhite (2016)
  14. Lehner et al. (2017)
  15. European Environment Agency (2017)
  16. Sepulcre-Canto et al. (2012); Spinoni et al. (2016), both in: European Environment Agency (2017)
  17. Gudmundsson and Seneviratne (2015); Spinoni et al. (2015, 2016), all in: European Environment Agency (2017)
  18. Stahl et al. (2010, 2012), in: European Environment Agency (2017)
  19. Stagge et al. (2015), in: European Environment Agency (2017)
  20. Naumann et al. (2018)
  21. Ruosteenoja et al. (2018)
  22. Carrão et al. (2018)
  23. Spinoni et al. (2018)
  24. Briffa et al. (2009); Vicente-Serrano et al. (2014); Gudmundsson and Seneviratne (2015); Spinoni et al. (2015a, 2015b), all in: Spinoni et al. (2018)
  25. Hoerling et al. (2012); Spinoni et al. (2017a), both in: Spinoni et al. (2018)
  26. Spinoni et al. (2013, 2014), both in: Spinoni et al. (2018)
  27. Bordi et al. (2009); Seneviratne (2012); Kingston et al. (2015), all in: Spinoni et al. (2018)
  28. Spinoni et al. (2015a, 2015b, 2017a), all in: Spinoni et al. (2018)
  29. Nikulin et al. (2011); Heinrich and Gobiet (2012); Kjellström et al. (2013); IPCC (2014a, 2014b); Madsen et al. (2014), all in: Spinoni et al. (2018)
  30. Beniston et al. (2007); Jacob et al. (2014); Russo et al. (2014); IPCC (2014a), all in: Spinoni et al. (2018)
  31. Heinrich and Gobiet (2012); Forzieri et al. (2014); Sein et al. (2014); IPCC (2014a), all in: Spinoni et al. (2018)
  32. Xu et al. (2019)
  33. Marvel et al. (2019)
  34. Manning et al. (2019)
  35. Raymond et al. (2019)
  36. Boergens et al. (2020)
  37. Ionita and Nagavciuc (2021)
  38. IPCC (2018); McCabe and Wolock (2015); Spinoni et al. (2018), all in: Ionita and Nagavciuc (2021)
  39. CRED and UNISDR (2019), in: Ionita and Nagavciuc (2021)
  40. Ionita et al. (2017); Van Lanen et al. (2016), both in: Ionita and Nagavciuc (2021)
  41. Bakke et al. (2020); Hari et al. (2020); Ionita et al. (2020, 2021); Ionita and Nagavciuc (2020); Schuldt et al. (2020), all in: Ionita and Nagavciuc (2021)
  42. Vicente-Serrano et al. (2020)
  43. Spinoni et al. (2017), in: Naumann et al. (2021)
  44. Forzieri et al. (2014); Samaniego et al. (2018); Marx et al. (2018), all in: Naumann et al. (2021)
  45. EEA (2011), in: Naumann et al. (2021)
  46. Naumann et al. (2021), in: Naumann et al. (2021)
  47. Lehner et al. (2005); Van Vliet et al. (2013); Kovats et al. (2014); Zampieri et al. (2020), all in: Naumann et al. (2021)
  48. Jacob et al. (2018), in: Naumann et al. (2021)
  49. Büntgen et al. (2021)
  50. Hänsel et al. (2022)
  51. Van der Wiel et al. (2023)
  52. Tabari and Willems (2023)
  53. WMO (2021) in: Tabari and Willems (2023)
  54. Shekhar et al. (2024)
  55. Bevacqua et al. (2024) 
  56. Gebrechorkos et al. (2025)

Share this article: